send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Legal Principle: An essential condition in a contract for sale of goods is that the seller hastitle over the goods sold.
Fact Situation: Ranjan pays rupees two thousand and buys a watch from Mohit who runs a watchshowroom and a repair shop. Jatin sees the watch with Ranjan and tells him that it is his watch and wasonly given to Mohit for repairs. If what Jatin says is true.
Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?
Ranjan is now the owner of the watch since he paid rupees two thousand for it.
Ranjan is not the owner of the watch since Mohit did not have a title to it.
Mohit must pay Jatin rupees two thousand since he sold Jatin’s watch.
Mohit is the owner of the watch since he sold it to Ranjan.
Ranjan is not the owner of the watch since Mohit did not have a title to it, because an essential condition in a contract for sale of goods is that the seller hastitle over the goods sold.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses