send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: In case where there is an infringement of legal right even without any actual loss or damage, the person whose right is Infringed has a cause of action.
Facts: 'P' was wrongfully prevented by the Returning officer from exercising his vote in an assembly election. Still he ('P') brought an action claiming damages. Which of the following derivations is correct?
'P' would succeed in his action, as it is mandatory to cast vote.
'P' would succeed in his action, as he was wrongfully prevented from exercising his legal right of voting in that election.
'P' would not succeed in his action, as he did not suffer any loss in that election.
'P' would not succeed in his action, as the candidate for whom he wanted to give his vote won the election.
As right to vote is a legal right not a fundamental right but no one can be wrongfully stopped from exercising his legal duty. 'P' would succeed in his action, as he was wrongfully prevented from exercising his legal right of voting in that election.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses