send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle : Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.
Facts : 'B' was formally invited by 'A' to his house. 'B' after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. 'A' sued 'B' for trespass.
'B' has interfered with privacy of 'A'.
'B' has committed no trespass as he entered the house with 'A's consent.
'B' has offended 'A' by moving to bed room.
'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bed room.
The factual situation clarifies that B was invited by A for dinner. The principle says that consent and purpose goes hand in hand. In this situation a dinner invitation does not imply a permission to enter the bedroom of the host, hence the tort of trespass has taken place. 'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bed room.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses