send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: When a person consented to an act to be done by another, he cannot claim any damages resulting from doing that act, provided the act done is the same for which consent is given.
Facts: 'P' submitted a written consent to a surgeon 'S' for undergoing a surgical operation for removal of appendicitis. The surgeon while doing surgery also removed the gall bladder of 'A':
'P' can claim damages from 'S'
'P' is required to pay expenses for surgery for Appendicitis but not for Gall Bladder
'P' cannot claim damages from 'S'
'P' is not bound to pay expenses of the surgery
P can claim compensation because his consent was only for removing of appendicitis not for removal of gall bladder... And according to the principle he can't claim compensation for the act done is the same for "which consent is given" and there is clear case of not given consent for gall bladder removing. 'P' can claim damages from 'S'
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses