send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
PRINCIPLE: Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that regard being had to them it is the duty of the person keeping silence to speak or unless his silence is, in itself equivalent to speech.
FACT: A sell by auction to B, a horse which A knows to be unsound. A says nothing to B about the horse’s unsoundness.
A can be held liable for fraud.
A can be held liable for misrepresentation.
A cannot be held liable because he did not say anything positive about the soundness of horse.
A cannot be held liable because it is the buyer who must be aware of the things.
One has a duty to speak in those situations where the circumstances are of such a nature that silence could be equated with speech , hence in this situation A was not obligated or duty bound to speak.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses