send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Ramu applied for the post of Director in an organization. The governing body of the organization passed a resolution appointing him to the post. After the meeting, one of the members of the governing body informed him privately of the resolution. Subsequently, the resolution was rescinded. Ramu claims damages. Which one of the following is the correct legal proposition in the case?
Ramu cannot claim damages as he had not resigned from his existing post in anticipation of getting the appointment letter
Ramu cannot claim damages as there was no formal communication
Ramu can claim damages as governing body cannot rescind the resolution once passed
Ramu can claim damages as there was private communication
One of the members in his private capacity informed Ramu about the decision of the body. Hence, Ramu cannot claim damages. Communication to Raju should have been made by the Board.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses