send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Select the option that is related to the third term in the same way as the second term is related to the first term and the sixth term is related to the fifth term. 6 : 646 :: 5: ? :: 4 : 190
373
377
337
376
Let's break down the relationship:
- The pattern:
6 : 646
4 : 190
5 : ?
- Notice:
For 6: 6 × 6 × (6 + 1) = 6 × 6 × 7 = 252 (but that isn’t 646)
Let's try: Six followed by 6² + 6 = 6 followed by (36+6) => 636? No.
Check calculation pattern: 6 × (6 × 6) + 6 = 6 × 36 + 6 = 216 + 6 = 222
Not matching.
- Let's check 4 : 190 pattern:
Try: 4 × (4 × 4) + 4 = 4 × 16 + 4 = 64 + 4 = 68
Not matching either.
- Let's look for alternate logic:
* If we split:
646 = 6 (number), then two times 6, then 4. 6 --> 4 --> 6
190 = 1, 9, 0 Which doesn't seem to form a sequence.
* Let's try concatenation:
6 : 646 (It seems like *6 to 4* to 6)
4 : 190 (There's ‘4’ in 190 (1+9+0 = 10))
- Try another calculation:
Check 6³ + 6 × 6 + 6 => 216 + 36 + 6 = 258
- Now let's just try the options for 5:
373, 377, 337, 376
Given, 4 : 190, 6 : 646
Is there any pattern like n, n², n so --> 6, 36, 6 as in 646,
and 4, 16, 0? But 416 doesn't match 190.
- Let's check:
Number × 100 + Number × 10 + Number
6 × 100 + 4 × 10 + 6 = 600 + 40 + 6 = 646
4 × 100 + 9 × 10 + 0 = 400 + 90 + 0 = 490 ?
6 × 100 + 4 × 10 + 6 = 646
4 × 100 + 9 × 10 + 0 = 490 ?
- Perhaps formula: n × 100 + (n+1) × 10 + n
For n=6: 6×100 + 7×10 + 6 = 600+70+6=676 ?
For n=4: 4×100 + 5×10 + 4 = 400+50+4=454 ?
- If it's just stylized as
For 6: 646
For 4: 190
Let's try 5: Option analysis:
- None seem to exactly match a clear formula above.
Given the options, let’s use the pattern to check for consistency:
- Let’s check difference between numbers as digits:
646 (digits add to 16)
190 (digits add to 10)
5 : ? (Next plausible sum: 10 down 6 = 4; But no. Try digits forming ‘373’)
* 373 (3+7+3 = 13)
* 377 (3+7+7 = 17)
* 337 (3+3+7 = 13)
* 376 (3+7+6 = 16)
Does the sequence suggest a pattern?
Let's take another pattern:
646 / 6 = 107.666…
190 / 4 = 47.5
373 / 5 = 74.6
Nothing exact.
Based on the list of options and series, it looks like Option 1: 373 does fit the type of pattern being presented (visually, 6-4-6, now with a possible 3-7-3 for 5).
Summary:
- Option 1: 373 — Similar visual repetition as 646, thus most consistent pattern.
- Other options do not follow the visual duplication style.
- Correct Answer: Option 1, 373.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses