send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Select the option in which the numbersare related in the same way as are the numbersin the givenset.
(14, 18, 277)
(20,22, 521)
(12, 32, 320)
(18, 16, 485)
(24, 20, 576)
Okay, here’s what’s going on:
Let's look at the set (14, 18, 277):
- First, notice 14 × 18 = 252. But 277 is 25 more than that.
- 14 × 18 = 252 ? 252 + 25 = 277.
So the pattern seems to be:
Multiply the first two numbers, then add 25.
Now, let's test each option:
Option 1: (20, 22, 521)
- 20 × 22 = 440; 440 + 25 = 465 (but 521 ? 465)
Option 2: (12, 32, 320)
- 12 × 32 = 384; 384 + 25 = 409 (but 320 ? 409)
Option 3: (18, 16, 485)
- 18 × 16 = 288; 288 + 25 = 313 (but 485 ? 313)
Option 4: (24, 20, 576)
- 24 × 20 = 480; 480 + 25 = 505 (but 576 ? 505)
To recap:
- None of the options fit the pattern perfectly, but if we check if there’s another relation, let's quickly try squaring and factoring:
- Not matching any alternative obvious patterns (squares, cubes, sums, differences).
There’s no clear fit with the given logic, but strictly using the multiplication-plus-25 pattern, none match. If there’s another pattern, it’s not visible from the options above. But based on calculation, none are correct, so yeah, your answer doesn’t fit the original relation.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses