send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Who uses dichotomization of role and triadization of relationship as bases for formation of social structure?
Levi Strauss
M. Fortes
S.F. Nadel
Marion J. Levy
Let’s break it down option by option:
- Option 1: Levi-Strauss
Famous for structural anthropology. He talks about deep structures in culture—binary oppositions (dichotomies) and also about triadic relationships (like the structure in kinship systems, where you get a three-way relationship: self, other, third).
Uses dichotomization and triadization to explain the formation of social structures.
- Option 2: M. Fortes
Big on kinship and African societies, but he didn’t propose this specific model of social structure with dichotomies and triads.
- Option 3: S.F. Nadel
He focused on social roles and the functions of actors in social systems—not exactly on dichotomy/triadization as the core for social structure.
- Option 4: Marion J. Levy
Levy wrote about social systems and modernization, but not through this lens of role/relationship dichotomies and triads.
By: Pradeep Kumar ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses