Explanation:

Let’s break this down—

- “Understanding of the situational choices and constraints of Independent” means really grasping the context and boundaries the person (or group) faces. That's core to verstehen—Max Weber wanted us to step into somebody’s actual conditions.

- “Coming at same wavelength with the actor” is about getting in sync with how that person thinks or feels. Basically, you’re syncing up perspectives.

- “Forming an emphatic liaison with the actor” is just fancy for empathy—connecting emotionally, not just observing coldly.

- “Subjectively analyzing the whole case” is important. Verstehen is all about interpreting meaning from the actor’s point of view, embracing that subjective angle instead of pretending to be purely objective.

Here are your options:

- Option 1: 1, 2, 3 — leaves out subjective analysis, which is critical to Weber’s method.

- Option 2: 1, 3, 4 — skips “same wavelength.”

- Option 3: 1, 2, 4 — skips empathy.

- Option 4: All of the above — covers every aspect and fits what Weber was after.

The right answer is: Option 4: All of the above

If you’re looking for the most accurate picture of what verstehen is, you need all four parts: context, empathy, wavelength, and subjective analysis. You can’t really understand someone’s actions without embracing every layer.