Explanation:

Let’s break down what each of these options means for how Marx interprets power:

- Interactionist:

- This angle looks at small-scale, everyday interactions. It's about how people influence each other in social situations.

- Not Marx’s focus—he’s more interested in big structures, not daily conversations.

- Conflict:

- Big here: it sees society as a battleground for scarce resources, where groups are always fighting for power and advantage.

- Marx is famous for seeing class struggle—workers vs. owners—as the driver of history.

- He sees power as rooted in material interests and economic conflict.

- Structural-functional:

- This view says every part of society has a job, helping society work smoothly and keep order.

- Marx would actually challenge this—he argues some structures exist to help powerful groups stay powerful.

- Structural:

- Focuses on the big social and economic structures that shape our lives.

- Marx is definitely about structures—class, economy, ownership—but that’s only half the story.

- He’s not just describing structures; he’s all about conflict within those structures.

Correct Answer: ?? Option 2 – Conflict

What this really means is:

- Marxian theory is best understood through the *conflict* lens. He sees power rooted in economic and class struggles, not just big structures alone.

- Structural is close, but it misses the engine: *conflict* is what drives society in Marx’s analysis.