send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
“We arrive at the structure of a society through abstracting from the concrete population and its behaviour the pattern or network of relationship obtaining between actors in their capacity of playing roles relative to one another”. Who gave this statement :
S.F. Nadel
Radcliffe Brown
R. Firth
H. Gerth and C.W. Mills
- Let’s break it down. The statement is about understanding society by focusing on relationships between the roles people play, not just the raw facts about people.
- Here’s who’s who:
- S.F. Nadel (Option 1): Nadel is famous for his work on social structure, especially his idea that social structure is basically the sum of these patterned relationships and roles. That’s exactly the mindset this quote comes from.
- Radcliffe-Brown (Option 2): He’s all about social structure too, but he focuses more on function and the “organism” of society—less about abstracting roles.
- R. Firth (Option 3): He’s huge in economic anthropology and social organization, but the specific focus on roles and relationships, abstracted like this? Not really his main argument.
- H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (Option 4): These guys worked together on translating Weber and focused on sociology, but their main buzz is about action theory and meaning, not quite what’s described here.
- What this really means is: Nadel is zooming out on society, stripping away the messiness and looking at the bones—the roles and patterned interactions. That’s signature Nadel.
By: Pradeep Kumar ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses