send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A key thesis of the 'end of ideology' and 'end of history' arguments is that...
no-one believes in ideology any more.
liberal democratic values are dominant in the developed world.
Karl Marx was right after all
history is a very tedious subject which should disappear from the National Curriculum.
Francis Fukuyama does not argue that history is a tedious subject; rather, it will no longer be made in the way it used to be, in the form of major conflicts and upheavals provoked by sharply contrasting beliefs. Equally, the 'end of ideology' thesis concerns the triumph of one ideology, rather than the end of all ideological thinking. The triumphant ideology in question is liberal democracy, rather than the Communist ideas advocated by Karl Marx
By: Gagandeep Singh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses