send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Can armed violence perpetrated by non-State actors ever amount to an armed attack under Article 51 UN Charter?
The conduct of non-State actors can never amount to an armed attack
The Caroline case serves as precedent that non-State actors can under particular circumstances commit an armed attack
There is no precedent in international law for the proposition that non-State actors can commit an armed attack
Non-State can both commit an armed attack and possess a right of self-defence under international law
The Caroline case serves as sound precedent that the actions of non-State actors can give rise to self-defence and thus they can indeed amount to an armed attack. Equally, the UNSC implicitly held following the 9/11 attacks that terrorist conduct of this magnitude gives rise to a right of self-defence.
By: Gagandeep Singh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses