send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Britain did not interfere with colonial creations like the House of Burgesses or Great Awakening because
they supported freedom of religion
the distance between the two places prevented reliable communication
Britain believed in no taxation without representation
the colonies were profitable, and therefore social and political events were often overlooked
Salutary neglect refers to England's loose control over the colonies. As long as the system of mercantilism made England financially happy, Parliamentary laws would not be fully enforced. This hands-off approach kept England from meddling In many political and social movements as well.
By: Gagandeep Singh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses