send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In a clear statement of the philosophical basis of copyright law, Justice Endlaw rejects the populist and uni-dimensional assumption that copyright is about the protection of the property rights of owners. He notes instead: “Copyright, specially in literary works, is thus not an inevitable, divine, or natural right that confers on authors the absolute ownership of their creations. ________________________________. Copyright is intended to increase and not to impede the harvest of knowledge. It is intended to motivate the creative activity of authors and inventors in order to benefit the public.”
The judgment has immense consequences beyond India and is a bold articulation of the principles of equitable access to knowledge — and one that deserves to be emulated globally.
To make this point, Justice Endlaw contrasts his own experiences as a law student where photocopying was very limited and studying entailed students copying by hand, scribe like, pages after pages of books.
This case, which was being closely tracked by students, teachers and the publishing industry alike, was seen as one with immense significance for questions of access to knowledge.
In his considered and sharply reasoned judgment, Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw examines the gamut of arguments made by both sides and arrives at the conclusion that copyright is a statutory right and not a natural right.
It is designed rather to stimulate activity and progress in the arts for the intellectual enrichment of the public.
Correct Answer is (e).This is really a very easy question of paragraph completion. If you can observe, the blank part comes between the double quotes in which Justice Endlaw elaborates Copyrights in the purview of his judgment. Among the choices given, all other sentences except option E are parts of the description given by the author, while the sentence given as option E is clearly a quote made by Justice Endlaw regarding his judgment on the Copyright Act. And the pronoun ‘It’ (which is used for ‘Copyright’ which was the subject of the previous statement) in the beginning of the sentence also confirms it. Option E is hence the correct answer.
By: Abhishek kumar ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses