No Right is absolute exclusive or inviolable The Right of personal property similarly has to be perc...........

English ( Master) Reading Comprehension (C)

No Right is absolute, exclusive or inviolable. The Right of personal property, similarly, has to be perceived in the larger context of its assumed legitimacy. The Right of personal property should unite the principle of liberty with that of equality, and both with the principle of cooperation.

In the light of the argument in the above passage, which one of the following statements is the most convincing explanation?

The Right of personal property is a Natural Right duly supported by statutes and scriptures.

Personal property is a theft and an instrument of exploitation. The Right of personal property is therefore violative of economic justice.

The Right of personal property is violative of distributive justice and negates the principle of cooperation.

The comprehensive idea of economic justice demands that the Right of each person to acquisition of property has to be reconciled with that of others.

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Reading Comprehension (C)

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

- Option 1: Suggests that the Right of personal property is inherent and fully justified by laws and traditions. However, the passage argues against absolute rights, indicating that property rights may need limitations.

- Option 2: Views personal property as inherently exploitative. This is a radical stance that the passage does not support, as it discusses balancing property rights with liberty, equality, and cooperation.

- Option 3: Argues property rights violate justice and cooperation. While it touches on potential conflicts, it presents a negative view not fully aligned with the nuanced argument of the passage.

- Option 4: Highlights the need to balance property rights with others' rights, aligning with the passage's emphasis on integrating liberty, equality, and cooperation.