send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Read the passage below and asnswer the following questions In most earthquakes the Earth’s crust cracks like porcelain. Stress builds up until a fracture forms at a depth of a few kilometre and the crust slips to relieve the stress. Some earthquakes, however, take place hundreds of kilometres down in the Earth’s mantle, where high pressure makes rock so ductile that it flows instead of cracking, even under stress severe enough to deform it like putty. How can there be earthquakes at such depths? That such deep events do occur has been accepted only since 1927, when the seismologist Kiyoo Wadati convincingly demonstrated their existence. Instead of comparing the arrival times of seismic waves at different locations, as earlier researchers had done. Wadati relied on a time difference between the arrival of primary (P) waves and the slower secondary (S) waves. Because P and S waves travel at different but fairly constant speeds, the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to the distance from the earthquake focus, or rupture point. For most earthquakes, Wadati discovered, the interval was quite short near the epicenter, the point on the surface where shaking is strongest. For a few events, however, the delay was long even at the epicenter. Wadati saw a similar pattern when he analyzed data on the intensity of shaking. Most earthquakes had a small area of intense shaking, which weakened rapidly with increasing distance from the epicenter, but others were characterized by a lower peak intensity, felt over a broader area. Both the P-S intervals and the intensity patterns suggested two kinds of earthquakes: the more common shallow events, in which the focus lay just under the epicenter, and deep events, with a focus several hundred kilometers down. The question remained: how can such quakes occur, given that mantle rock at a depth of more than 50 kilometers is too ductile to store enough stress to fracture? Wadati’s work suggested that deep events occur in areas (now called Wadati-Benioff zones) where one crustal plate is forced under another and descends into the mantle. The descending rock is substantially cooler than the surrounding mantle and hence is less ductile and much more liable to fracture.
The author’s explanation of how deep events occur would be most weakened if which of the following were discovered to be true?
Deep events are far less common than shallow events.
Deep events occur in places other than where crustal plates meet.
Mantle rock is more ductile at a depth of several hundred kilometers than it is at 50 kilometers.
The speeds of both P and S waves are slightly greater than previously thought.
- Option 1: Deep events are less common than shallow events.
- This is consistent with the information in the passage. The rarity of deep events does not affect the explanation of their occurrence.
- Option 2: Deep events occur in places other than where crustal plates meet.
- This option contradicts the theory presented in the passage. The explanation relies on the fact that deep events occur in areas where crustal plates meet. If they occur elsewhere, it challenges the current understanding.
- Correct Answer
- Option 3: Mantle rock is more ductile at a depth of several hundred kilometers than it is at 50 kilometers.
- If true, this weakens the explanation since cooler, less ductile rock is key to the occurrence of deep events.
- Option 4: The speeds of both P and S waves are slightly greater than previously thought.
- This would affect the calculation of epicenter distance but does not impact the explanation of deep events.
By: Munesh Kumari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses