send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
He said, “You must not go now”.
He said that I was not to go at once.
He said that I had not to go at once.
He said that I must not to go at once.
He said that I was not supposed to go at once.
Let’s break it down:
- Option 1: He said that I was not to go at once.
This is correct. "You must not go now" in reported speech can become "was not to"—it's clear, formal, and accurate.
- Option 2: He said that I had not to go at once.
This isn’t standard English. "Had not to" is rarely, if ever, used by native speakers.
- Option 3: He said that I must not to go at once.
This adds an unnecessary "to"—that’s just grammatically wrong.
- Option 4: He said that I was not supposed to go at once.
This one is understandable, but "supposed to" softens the command, making it less direct than "must not." Not a faithful change.
By: SONAM SHEORAN ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses