send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Meenal spent three thousand rupees.
Three thousand rupees were spent by Meenal.
Three thousand rupees was spent by Meenal.
Three thousand rupees is spent by Meenal.
Three thousand rupees are spent by Meenal.
- Option 1: "Three thousand rupees were spent by Meenal."
- Incorrect. "Rupees" is a singular collective noun here, so "was" is more appropriate.
- Option 2: "Three thousand rupees was spent by Meenal."
- Correct Answer. The collective noun "rupees" takes the singular verb "was" in this passive construction.
- Option 3: "Three thousand rupees is spent by Meenal."
- Incorrect. This is present tense, while the original statement is past tense.
- Option 4: "Three thousand rupees are spent by Meenal."
- Incorrect. "Are" suggests ongoing action, but the spending occurred in the past.
By: SONAM SHEORAN ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses