send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Mr. A. Srivastava is the Deputy Commissioner of a district through which a major river flows, effectively cutting the district into two halves. The entire district has no bridge to connect the two halves and people who travel from one part of the district to another have to avail of the services of boatmen- whose ancestors have been playing this trade for centuries. Rows of eateries have also come up on both sides of the river- and they do brisk business. Mr.Srivastava is seriously considering sanctioning the building of a bridge to connect the two parts. This, he is sure, would facilitate trade and business and enhance economic activity in his district. However, his subordinates point out that the boatmen would lose their livelihoods and so also would the owners of the eateries on both sides of the river. Further, as per rules, Mr.Srivastava cannot offer compensation to those affected.
Which of the following decisions is/are most appropriate?
1. Since some people would be adversely affected by the building of a bridge, Mr Srivastava should not sanction the building of a bridge.
2. Mr Srivastava should sanction the building of a bridge only after he is in a position to offer alternative livelihoods to the boatmen.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
- Option 1: Not sanctioning the bridge solely because some people will be affected ignores the broader potential for economic growth and improved connectivity for the entire district.
- Option 2: Waiting until alternative livelihoods are available for boatmen might unnecessarily delay the development and improvement that the bridge could bring. Economic growth can provide new opportunities for those affected.
- Option 3: This option seems impractical as it combines both choices, potentially leading to indecision and stagnation.
- Option 4: A balanced approach is needed. Consider both immediate impacts and long-term benefits, looking for ways to support those affected while progressing with the bridge.
Correct Answer: Option 4 - Neither 1 nor 2
By: Munesh Kumari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses