send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Photography is no longer an art form. Nowadays everyone has access to digital cameras that only need to be pointed at the subject in order to generate a perfect image
Question: The writer of the argument apparently assumes that
the selection of the subject is not an important artistic factor in photography
digital cameras will continue to improve in quality
digital cameras can never go wrong
photography with all other types of camera is an art form
- The argument implies that photography is no longer an art form because digital cameras make it easy to take a "perfect image."
- Option 1 assumes that what makes photography an art—like selecting a subject—is not considered valuable when technology simplifies the process.
- Option 2 suggests an ongoing improvement in camera quality, but doesn't relate directly to the art form's nature.
- Option 3 supposes digital cameras never make errors, which the argument does not imply.
- Option 4 addresses photography with other cameras but not the digital aspect.
By: Gaurav Rana ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses