send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Read the passage and answer the following question: Now India’s children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the growing question is whether it will remain on paper or become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder of that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary a six-year-old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it the adult society which must act on behalf of a child’s right to education is denied no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society in India’s history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is ‘symptomatic of a deeper turmoil’ in the society which is compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls across runs across our cultural diversity and system of education has not been able to address it.
Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?
The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls
Adult society cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education
The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive
There is no sufficient substitute for education received for education
- Option 1: The passage mentions the tenacious prejudice against girls, but this isn't the main inference. It's part of the broader issue discussed.
- Option 2: The passage highlights that children cannot demand their right and the adult society must act. However, the main point is about the nature of education rights.
- Option 3: This option isn't directly discussed. The passage focuses on the challenges and significance of timely education, not the legal process.
- Option 4: The passage stresses that missing educational opportunities during childhood cannot be adequately compensated later.
By: Munesh Kumari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses