As per the author which of the followings illustrate the reasons for the BJP losing popularity ...........

English ( Master) Reading comprehension (P)

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow it. Some words are highlighted to help you to answer some of the questions.
For a party that had appeared to be lost in the political wilderness over the past few years, the Congress has plenty to cheer about following the results in the recent round of Assembly elections. In the three Hindi-speaking States, where it was locked in a direct contest with the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Congress has performed more than creditably, raising hopes of a revival of fortunes as the country gears up for the general election in 2019. A measure of how much of a reversal this is for the BJP can be gauged by comparing this result with that of the 2014 Lok Sabha election, when the BJP won 62 of the 65 parliamentary seats in the three States. If the Congress struggled to breast the tape in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, it was because independents and smaller parties registered a few surprise victories. If the results are interpreted as pointers on how the 2019 election will play out, then the Congress may be still short of where it would like to be. But the results may well infuse the party leadership with the confidence that it is on the comeback trail.
The best news for the Congress was of course Chhattisgarh. The presence of a third front in the form of the Janta Congress Chhattisgarh, led by former Chief Minister Ajit Jogi, and the Bahujan Samaj Party, which took away a chunk of the anti-incumbency votes, did nothing to deny the Congress a big win. Chhattisgarh had voted overwhelmingly for the BJP in 2014, giving it 10 of the 11 seats, and the dramatic reversal in fortunes must have shocked the BJP. But the Congress can also take heart from the performance in Madhya Pradesh, a much larger State that sends 29 members to the Lok Sabha. Although there was not much that separated the two parties in terms of vote share, the Congress can reasonably believe that the momentum is with it. In Rajasthan, where it performed stunningly in by-elections, and where anti-incumbency sentiment was believed to be riding high, the Congress, despite its victory, may regard its own performance as sub-par. For the BJP, the setback in Rajasthan, which has not been kind to the incumbent from 1998 onward, was no surprise. Despite conceding a substantial number of Assembly seats, the party can take solace from the fact that the difference in vote share between it and the Congress was minuscule.
However, looking forward, the BJP will be worried that the results will encourage the Congress and the BSP to come together in an electoral embrace. In Madhya Pradesh, the BSP has demonstrated its strength, or at the very least its capacity to be a spoiler. An alliance of the Samajwadi Party, the BSP and the Congress that extends beyond Uttar Pradesh to Madhya Pradesh can seriously alter the political landscape of the region.
As for the BJP, the results are an opportunity to introspect. Not just on the performance of its governments in the State, but also the performance of the Narendra Modi government at the Centre. To reduce the results of the Hindi-speaking States to the intangible anti-incumbency sentiment would be a mistake. After all, both Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh and Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan survived two elections as incumbents. A potent mix of rural distress and urban angst seem to have contributed to the erosion in the BJP’s support base. Farmers suffered disproportionately and for longer following demonetisation, and small traders in urban areas have felt handicapped by the straitjacket of the Goods and Services Tax. Both demonetisation and the Goods and Services Tax were implemented by the Centre. It may be tempting to think that aggressive cow vigilantism and the Ram temple will influence voter behaviour, but these elections underline it is livelihood concerns that really matter. The BJP will need to tackle issues of employment and development with better intent if it is to arrest the slide. The first term of a Prime Minister is won on promise, but the second term will have to be won on performance. Not even Narendra Modi is an exception to this.

As per the author, which of the followings illustrate the reasons for the BJP losing popularity?

(I) Demonetisation

(II) The Goods and Services Tax

(III) Concerns for livelihood

(IV) Aggressive cow vigilantism and the issue of Ram temple

(I), (II) and (III)

(I), (II) and (IV)

(II) and (IV)

(I) and (II)

All of (I), (II), (III) and (IV)

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Reading comprehension (P)

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

Correct Answer is (a).
The answer to the question can be found from certain sentences of the last paragraph. ‘A potent mix of rural distress and urban angst seem to have contributed to the erosion in the BJP’s support base. Farmers suffered disproportionately and for longer following demonetisation, and small traders in urban areas have felt handicapped by the straitjacket of the Goods and Services Tax. It may be tempting to think that aggressive cow vigilantism and the Ram temple will influence voter behaviour, but these elections underline it is livelihood concerns that really matter.’
Upon reading the above, one gets to understand that demonetisation caused rural distress and urban angst and both have contributed to the losing popularity of the BJP.
So, (I) and (II) have contributed to the loosing popularity of BJP.
Upon reading the clause ‘It may be tempting to think that aggressive cow vigilantism and the Ram temple will influence voter behaviour’, one gets to understand the issue of ‘aggressive cow vigilantism and the Ram temple’ have not contributed negatively to the popularity of the BJP, but the author is saying that the issue of ‘aggressive cow vigilantism and the Ram temple’ has no impact, either positive or negative, on the popularity of the BJP. So, (IV) is not contributing to the losing popularity of the BJP.
The clause ‘but these elections underline it is livelihood concerns that really matter’ suggests that concerns for livelihood really matter, and the election result not in favour of the BJP suggests that the BJP governments (esp. at the centre) has not given enough attention to issue of ‘livelihood concerns’ and hence, performed badly in the election. So, (III) has contributed to the loosing popularity of the BJP.
From above, it can be inferred that option (a) is the correct answer.