send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements regarding the dual system of administration of Bengal post 1750s:
1. Under this system, the Company directly controlled the fi nances and administration of the province.
2. The Nawab was dependent on the British for both his internal and external security.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Correct Option: (b) Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect: Under this system, the Company directly controlled the fi nances and the army while indirectly controlled the administration of the province. Dual System of Administration of Bengal The East India Company became the real master of Bengal from 1765. Its army was in sole control of its defense and the supreme political power was in its hands. The Nawab depended for his internal and external security on the British. As the Diwan, the Company directly collected its revenues, while through the right to nominate the Deputy Subahdar; it controlled the Nizamat or the police and judicial powers. The virtual unity of the two branches of Government under British control was signi fi ed by the fact that the same person acted in Bengal as the Deputy Diwan on behalf of the Company and as Deputy Subahdar on behalf of the Nawab. This arrangement is known in history as the Dual or Double Government. It held a great advantage for the British: they had power without responsibility. They controlled the fi nances of the province and its army directly and its administration indirectly. The Nawab and his offi cials had the responsibility of administration but not the power to discharge it. The weaknesses of the Government could be blamed on the Indians while its fruits were gathered by the British. The consequences for the people of Bengal were disastrous: neither the Company nor the Nawab cared for their welfare. Topic: Modern History Sub-Topic: Dual Administration after battle of plassey
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses