send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Two real brothers Hukum Singh and Sukhram and Sukhram’s son Chhidda constituted a Joint Hindu Family governed by the Benaras School of Mitakshara Law under which a coparcener without obtaining the consent of the other coparceners was not competent to sell his undivided share for his own benefit. Hukum Singh died in 1952 and his widow Smt. Kishan Devi on 15.11.1956 sold ½ share in the family house and shop to Ram Avtar. Sukhram and Chhidda filed a suit, which was contested upto the Supreme Court of India (Appeal No. 21, 2004)
Answer the following questions :-
(i) Whether the sale deed is liable to be cancelled ?
(ii) Whether the Hindu Widow’s right in the property of the Joint Hindu Family became larger than her deceased husband ?
(iii) Whether Kishan Devi continued to have only a limited interest ? (5 marks)
(iv) Whether the Hindu widow Kishan Devi had already become absolute owner ?
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses