The defendant Ram Lal betel seller took the plaintiff Sunder Lal rsquo s wooden shop on rent and des......

The defendant Ram Lal betel-seller took the plaintiff Sunder Lal’s wooden shop on rent and despite the tenant’s prudent care, the rioters set fire to the shop and destroyed it and the defendant according to the terms of the agreement failed to “return the same in the same condition”. Whether the defendant as its bailee is liable to make good the loss and pay damage to the plaintiff? Discuss.      (5 marks)

By: santosh