send mail to email@example.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
Please verify your mobile number
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Refer & Earn
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Section 114 illustration (b) of the Evidence Act provides that “the court may presume that an accomplice is unworthy of credit unless he is corroborated in material particulars”. But Section 133 of the same Act provides that “an accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person, and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice”. How would you reconcile these two provisions. (5 marks)
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources