send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The appellant -landlord filed an eviction petition against the two respondents on the ground, inter-alia, of subletting, that respondent 1, S, had sublet the tenanted premises, a shop, to respondent 2, M. It was admitted that S and M were brothers, and that S being involved in certain criminal proceedings, had absconded for quite some time. The Rent Controller allowed the petition and ordered for eviction. The appellate court dismissed the tenant’s appeal. The High court allowed the tenant’s revision. Was the High Court justified in allowing the tenant’s revision. Answer with reference to provisions of the H.P.
Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 and relevant case law on the point, if any. (5 marks)
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources