send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider a long straight wire with uniform linear charge density \( \lambda \). According to Gauss's theorem, the electric field at a distance \( r \) from the wire is given by:
(i) electric flux depends on the charge enclosed.
(ii) Gauss's law relates electric field to electric flux.
(iii) symmetry allows simplification of electric field calculation.
The electric field due to an infinitely long straight wire with linear charge density \( \lambda \) is derived using Gauss's law which states that the electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed.
The correct expression is \( E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0r} \), reflecting the radial symmetry and 1/r dependence.
Option 2 describes a 1/r² dependence which is incorrect for a line charge.
Option 3 addresses a direction along the wire, which contradicts the symmetry and radial nature of the field.
Option 4 suggests an exponential behavior, which is not applicable here.
By: Parveen Bansal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses