send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Context: An acid attack in in Delhi has once again brought back to focus the heinous crime of acid attacks and the easy availability of corrosive substances.
An acid attack, also called acid throwing, vitriol attack, or vitriolage, is a form of violent assault involving the act of throwing acid or a similarly corrosive substance onto the body of another.
It intends to disfigure, maim, torture, or kill.
Perpetrators of these attacks throw corrosive liquids at their victims, usually at their faces, burning them, and damaging skin tissue, often exposing and sometimes dissolving the bones.
The most common types of acid used in these attacks are sulphuric and nitric acid.
Hydrochloric acid is sometimes used but is much less damaging.
Though heinous, acid attacks on women are not as prevalent a crime as others against women.
According to data compiled by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), there were 150 such cases recorded in 2019, 105 in 2020 and 102 in 2021.
West Bengal and UP consistently record the highest number of such cases generally accounting for nearly 50% of all cases in the country year on year.
The charge-sheeting rate of acid attacks stood at 83% and the conviction rate at 54% in 2019.
In 2020, the figures stood at 86% and 72% respectively.
In 2021, the figures were recorded to be 89% and 20% respectively.
Until 2013, acid attacks were not treated as separate crimes.
In 2013, after some amendments, acid attacks were put under a separate section (326A) of the IPC.
A minimum imprisonment of 10 years which is extendable to life along with fine.
Punishment for denial of treatment to victims or police officers refusing to register an FIR or record any piece of evidence.
Denial of treatment (by both public and private hospitals) can lead to imprisonment of up to one year and dereliction of duty by a police officer is punishable by imprisonment of up to two years.
Based on Supreme Court directions, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) asked States to make sure acid attack victims are paid compensation of at least Rs. 3 lakhs by the concerned State Government/Union Territory as the aftercare and rehabilitation cost.
States are supposed to ensure that treatment provided to acid attack victims in any hospital, public or private, is free of cost.
The cost incurred on treatment is not to be included in the Rs 1 lakh compensation given to the victim.
In 2013, the Supreme Court took cognizance of acid attacks and passed an order on the regulation of sales of corrosive substances.
Based on the order, the MHA issued an advisory to all states on how to regulate acid sales and framed the Rules under The Poisons Act, 1919.
It asked states to frame their own rules based on model rules, as the matter fell under the purview of states.
Over-the-counter sale of acid was not allowed unless the seller maintains a logbook/register recording the sale of acid.
This logbook was to also contain the details of the person to whom acid is sold, the quantity sold, the address of the person and also specify the reason for procuring acid.
The sale is also to be made only when the buyer produces a photo ID containing his address issued by the government.
The buyer must also prove he/she is above 18 years of age.
Sellers are required to declare all stocks of acid with the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) within 15 days and in case of undeclared stock of acid.
The SDM can confiscate the stock and suitably impose a fine of up to Rs 50,000 for a breach of any of the directions.
The rules ask educational institutions, research laboratories, hospitals, government departments and the departments of Public Sector Undertakings, which are required to keep and store acid, to maintain a register of usage of acid and file the same with the concerned SDM.
In 2015, MHA issued an advisory to all states to ensure speedy justice in cases of acid attacks by expediting prosecution.
In August 2021, MHA issued another advisory to all States/ UTs to review and ensure that the retail sale of acids and chemicals is strictly regulated in terms of the Poison Rules so that these are not used in crime.
MHA suggested that states should also extend social integration programs to the victims for which NGOs could be funded to exclusively look after their rehabilitative requirements.
The key to solving this problem remains in society. Parents must teach their children the importance of boundaries and consent.
There is a strong need to create more awareness.
Things have improved compared to the past as social attitudes are changing and the focus of the police in dealing with crimes against women can cause some deterrence.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses