send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements with reference to judgement of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh:
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both
None
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has ruled that the completion of seven years of continuous service alone would not entitle a daily wager for regularization, unless other eligibility conditions were fulfilled.
The Division Bench of Chief Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice Javed Iqbal Wani set aside a single-judge verdict directing the authorities to regularize the daily wagers from the date they had completed seven years continuously in service.
The judgement stated that a Daily Rated Worker would become eligible for regularization on fulfilment of all the conditions as contained in Rule 4 of the provisions of SRO 64. Completion of seven years of continuous period of daily wage service alone thus would not entitle a daily wager for regularization unless such daily wager fulfills other eligibility conditions.
The Court was hearing an appeal against the judgment passed in favour of daily wagers who were engaged by the administration in 1994.
They had pleaded for their service from 2001 to 2009 to be considered for all service benefits including promotion, seniority, pension and other monetary benefits.
The daily wagers claimed that they were entitled to regularization from April 1, 2001, on which date they completed seven years of service. However, the process was not finalized by the State for unknown reasons, owing to which they came to be regularized on December 30, 2009 with prospective effect.
The single-judge, in an order passed in 2017, directed the authorities to give effect to their regularization with effect from the date they had completed seven years of continuous service.
Report error
Access to prime resources