send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
Please verify your mobile number
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Refer & Earn
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
=> The Karnataka High Court is hearing a challenge to the constitutionality of the state government’s ban on students wearing a hijab in educational institutions.
What is Public Order?
=> Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees to all persons the right to freedom and conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion subject to public order, morality and health.
Who has the power to legislate on aspects of public order?
=> Public order is normally equated with public peace and safety. According to List 2 of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, the power to legislate on aspects of public order rests with the states.
How does it relate to the hijab ban?
The state government has issued an order under the Karnataka Education Act, 1983.
However, the petitioners have asked the state to show how the mere wearing of a hijab by students could constitute a public order issue. This is not a case where a religious practice involves a public gathering where dangerous weapons are paraded.
How has public order been interpreted by courts?
Courts have broadly interpreted it to mean something that affects the community at large and not a few individuals. In Ram Manohar Lohia vs State of Bihar (1965), the Supreme Court held that in the case of ‘public order’, the community or the public at large have to be affected by a particular action.
One has to imagine three concentric circles, the largest representing ‘law and order’, the next representing ‘public order’ and the smallest representing ‘security of State’.”
By: ASRAF UDDIN AHMED ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources