Explanation:

Let’s break this down step by step:

- SACRIFY : ARFYICS

If you look, “SACRIFY” becomes “ARFYICS” by moving the first two letters to the end:

SACRIFY ? CRIFYSA, but that's not matching. Let’s try rearrangement.

Wait—ARFYICS is just a rearrangement (an anagram) of SACRIFY.

- NUMERAL : UEALRMN

“NUMERAL” is rearranged as “UEALRMN” — another anagram.

- So the pattern is: The second word is an anagram of the first.

- Now, SHALLOW : ?

Let’s see which option is an anagram of “SHALLOW”:

1. HLLWOAS (H,L,L,W,O,A,S)

2. HLOWLAS (H,L,O,W,L,A,S)

3. HLOLAWS (H,L,O,L,A,W,S)

4. HLWLASO (H,L,W,L,A,S,O)

But here's the thing: Option 1 “HLLWOAS” only has one “L” but “SHALLOW” has two “L”s. Option 2, 3, and 4 each use all the original letters once (S,H,A,L,L,O,W).

- Option 2: HLOWLAS

H, L, O, W, L, A, S — all there, but “O” before “W.”

Yes, it uses all letters, so it’s valid.

- Option 3: HLOLAWS

H, L, O, L, A, W, S — also valid.

- Option 4: HLWLASO

H, L, W, L, A, S, O — also valid.

But to match the previous examples (ARFYICS, UEALRMN), there’s no deeper sequence pattern, it just needs to be an anagram. So more than one answer could technically work. But the question says “which option,” so I have to pick the one that fits straightforwardly.

Option 2: HLOWLAS uses all letters in “SHALLOW,” matches the approach, and sits in the shortest word order.

---