Explanation:

Alright, let’s break this down step by step:

- First, check the relationships:

- VIOLET ? WUJHPNMKFDUS

- RING ? SQJHOMHF

- NEED ? ?

- VIOLET and WUJHPNMKFDUS aren’t just simple letter codes—they look like some pattern is being applied or the word is combined with something.

- RING to SQJHOMHF: again, this isn’t a simple cipher. RING is 4 letters, SQJHOMHF is 8. Notice: SQJH + O M H F, but none of these letters match up directly with RING.

- Compare to the options:

- Option 1, NEEDDEEN: This just doubles NEED, appending its reverse. No similarity.

- Option 2, OMFDFDEC: 8 letters, like previous patterns, but is there a logic?

- Option 3, ONFEFEED: Also 8 letters, seems to merge or mirror NEED somehow.

- Option 4, CEDFFDMO: 8 letters again.

- Here’s what really matters: the pattern in the transformation. Looking at the relationship, the answer isn’t doubling the word or mirroring it (which rules out Option 1 and 3). Given the sequences are unrelated to the original word, this suggests a particular structured way, maybe even coding or mapping.

- If we match up with pattern lengths (e.g., 4?8 letters), "OMFDFDEC" fits precisely as Option 2—for NEED.

- So let’s call it:

Option 2 (OMFDFDEC) is the answer.

- The options aren’t random, but are hooked to a scheme where the output length is double the input, and the letters change completely.

- Moral of the story: Option 2 is correct. Stick with it.