send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In the sentence identify the segment which contains the grammatical error.
No sooner he had left the house than there was a phone call for him.
than there was
for him
No sooner
he had left
Let’s break down each option:
- Option 1: "than there was"
This phrase is fine. It follows the "No sooner... than..." structure correctly.
- Option 2: "for him"
No problem here. It clearly just says who the phone call was for.
- Option 3: "No sooner"
The sentence is using the right idiomatic pair: "No sooner...than...". But, there’s a catch—this phrase needs inversion at the start of the sentence.
- Option 4: "he had left"
This is where things go off. After "No sooner," we need inversion—so it should be "had he left" not "he had left."
Option 4 is the correct answer!
The sentence should read: "No sooner had he left the house than there was a phone call for him."
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses