send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Identify the segment in the sentence which contains the grammatical error. If there is no error, select 'No error'.
The detective compared the forged signature to the original.
the forged signature
to the original
The detective compared
No error
- Option 1: the forged signature
There is no grammatical error here. This phrase is correctly formed as the object of comparison.
- Option 2: to the original
This segment includes a subtle grammatical error. In standard formal English, the correct preposition for direct comparison is "with" not "to." It should read “The detective compared the forged signature with the original.”
- Option 3: The detective compared
This phrase is grammatically correct. It sets the subject and action for the sentence.
- Option 4: No error
This option suggests the sentence is entirely correct, which isn't accurate due to the error identified in Option 2.
Answer: Option 2: to the original
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses