send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The common price level is used by meaningful comparison because
Domestic price in different countries
100 GDP of one country is not as same as 100 GDP of other countries
Both
None of the above
• Option 1 says the common price level is important because domestic prices vary a lot between countries. That’s totally true—it’s hard to compare economic output if a loaf of bread costs $1 in one country and $5 in another.
• Option 2 points out that “100 GDP” in one country isn’t the same as “100 GDP” in another. Absolutely right. The same number doesn’t buy you the same amount of goods, so using a common measure (like purchasing power parity, or PPP) gives us a fairer comparison.
• Option 3 gives us both reasons—makes sense, since both statements get to why standardizing price levels matters.
• Option 4 is just “none,” and obviously, that’s not the case here.
Option 3 is the correct answer.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses