send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Medking Ltd. is required to have vigil mechanism and has an existing Audit Committee. Mr. A is a member of this Audit Committee and Chairperson. Besides, he is a consultant to Goodmeds Ltd., who supply raw material to Medking Ltd. Mr. Truthful an employee in the testing department found the supplies of Goodmeds to be substandard and accused Mr. A of accepting kickbacks. And brought this to notice of the higher-ups. After no response to his complaint he approached the Audit Committee. Mr. A who is also the Chairman of Audit Committee participated in the ensuing discussions. Can Mr A participate in such business of Audit Committee despite the apparent conflicts of interest?
No, as the Companies Act requires a person having conflict of interest to recuse himself from deliberations on those matters.
Yes, provided that such resolutions passed as a result of deliberations are further ratified at Board Meeting
None of these.
May be
under the Old Companies Act, a conflicted director was prohibited from voting on a matter or agreement in which he/she was interested after making a disclosure but he/she could attend the meeting and participate in the deliberations of the matter or agreement at the discretion of the board. This is in stark contrast to section 75 of the Companies Act which provides that a conflicted director is not only required to recuse himself/herself from voting on a matter where he/she has a conflicting interest, but must also recuse himself/herself from the relevant meeting and may not take part in the consideration of the matter except to disclose the interest and its general nature or any material information relating to the matter;
By: Srishti Gupta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses