In the first order on July 4 the court declared all animals as legal persons effectively blurring th...........

English Language (SBI-CL) Reading comprehension (P)

Directions (): In each of the questions given below, a passage has been given which are either situational based or describes a scenario. Below each passage, a question has been given which is framed to make you to infer something out of it. Mark out the correct inference as your answer.

In the first order on July 4, the court declared all animals as legal persons, effectively blurring the line that separates humans from other animals. Instead of blurring the line between man and animal, it would make more sense for the judiciary to ask the government to bolster laws like the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. Moreover, the order should have recognized that the animals had more value than just property under law even if they were not defined as persons. Such an order is more likely to have a lasting impact on animal welfare than an order declaring all animals to be persons.

Animal welfare is difficult to be advanced through High Court’s order.

The court’s order will effectively protect the animals from the inhumanity.

Implementation of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 were a failure.

There is a need to convert animals into human entities to treat them with respect.

None of these

Explanation:

The given paragraph is providing information about the court’s order regarding the declaration of animals as legal persons. However, the paragraph further mentions that this order will not have a lasting impact on animal welfare. Moreover, it is to be noted that it mentions about the strengthening of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and does not comment on their implementation, hence, option (c) is incorrect. Therefore, the most suitable answer choice is option (a).

Report error

Submit Error