send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
tatements and conclusions are given below. Consider these statements as true however they might not match with the general facts and decide which conclusion follows the statement.
Statement
Ranjeet was insulted by his supervisor in front of his colleagues
Conclusion
I. Supervisor doesn’t like Ranjeet
II. Ranjeet was popular among his colleagues.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Both conclusion I and II follows
Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Ranjit was insulted by his supervisor because he might have done something wrong. The clear reason is not mentioned in the statement. Hence, none of the conclusion follow.
By: Barka Mirza ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses