send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, Read all the given conclusions and then decide which of the following conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some Poles are not Stops.
Some Signals are not Poles.
Some Stops are not Signals.
Conclusions:
I. Some Poles are definitely not Signals.
II. Some Signals are not Poles.
III. All Poles being Signals is a possibility.
Only I follows
Only II follows
Only III follows
All Follows
None of these
- Statements Interpretation:
- Some Poles are not Stops: There are Poles which are definitely not Stops.
- Some Signals are not Poles: Some Signals exist that are not Poles.
- Some Stops are not Signals: Some Stops do not fall under Signals.
- Conclusions Evaluation:
- I. Some Poles are definitely not Signals: This does not necessarily follow as no direct relationship between Poles and Signals that ensures this.
- II. Some Signals are not Poles: This directly aligns with the second statement and is definitely true.
- III. All Poles being Signals is a possibility: Since nothing in the statements denies this relationship, it's possible.
- Conclusion:
- Option 2 is correct as Only Conclusion II follows the statements.
Therefore, your selection is incorrect.
Report error
Please Wait..
Access to prime resources