send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In the given question, a sentence is divided into four parts. There are errors in three parts. Choose the part which doesn’t have an error. If all the four parts are correct, mark E, i.e. ‘All are correct’ as the answer.
The Supreme Court has done (A)/ three weeks to the state government to (B)/ be respondent to its directive and (C)/ file an affidavit citing all the detail. (D)
A
B
C
D
All are correct
Out of the given parts, only part B is correct. Part A is erroneous because the duration of three weeks will be given or granted to an authority and not done. In part C, the phrase “be respondent” is grammatically incorrect. “Respond to”, which means to react to or give an answer to, should be used instead. Part D has an error “all” would imply multiple details. So, the phrase can either be “file an affidavit citing all the details” or “file an affidavit citing the detail”. Therefore, only part B is error free.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses