• The Sixth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on Global Warming at 1.5°C distinctly propagates the need to strengthen and enhance existing coping capacity and to remain committed to the objectives of the Paris Agreement

Why climate adaptation to agriculture is necessary :-

• India, with its diverse agro-climatic settings, is one of the most vulnerable countries.
• India’s agriculture ecosystem is distinguished by high monsoon dependence.Even the recent monsoon season (June-September) ended with a rainfall deficit of 9%, which was just short of drought conditions.
• With 85% small and marginal landholdings, is highly sensitive to weather abnormalities. 
• There has been less than normal rainfall during the last four years, with 2014 and 2015 declared as drought years.
• Research is also confirming an escalation in heat waves, in turn affecting crops, aquatic systems and livestock. 
• The Economic Survey 2017-18 has estimated farm income losses between 15% and 18% on average, which could rise to 20%-25% for unirrigated areas without any policy interventions. These projections underline the need for strategic change in dealing with climate change in agriculture.

Way forward:-

• Microlevel :-
  1. Traditional wisdom, religious epics and various age-old notions about weather variations still guide farmers responses which could be less effective. Corroborating these with climate assessments and effective extension and promoting climate resilient technologies will enhance their pragmatism.
  2. Climate exposure can be reduced through agronomic management practices such as inter and multiple cropping and crop-rotation, shift to non-farm activities, insurance covers,up-scaling techniques such as solar pumps, drip irrigation and sprinklers.
  3. There is an urgent need to educate farmers, reorient Krishi Vigyan Kendras and other grass-root organisations with specific and more funds about climate change and risk-coping measures.
• Macro level :-
  1. Climate adaptations are to be mainstreamed in the current developmental framework. Mainstreaming adaptation into the policy apparatus has the potential to improve the resilience of several development outcomes. The approach demands coherence across multiple policy scales as required for developing possible synergy between micro-macro levels and addressing several cross-cutting issues. 
  2. Expansion of extension facilities, improving irrigation efficiency, promotion of satellite-enabled agriculture risk management, creating micro-level agro-advisories, providing customised real time data, and capacity building of stakeholders are some initiatives towards building greater resilience in agriculture.
  3. Interventions such as the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, Soil Heath Card, Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana, National Agriculture Market, or e-NAM, and other rural development programmes are positive interventions that can address the vulnerability of farmers and rural households.
  4. There are also exclusive climate and adaptation schemes being operationalised, such as the National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA), the National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA), the National Adaptation Fund, and the State Action Plan on Climate Change (SAPCC). It is desirable to have a cultural change wherein some of the components under these schemes can be converged with major rural developmental programmes, which will further enhance their effectiveness at the grass-root level.  The SAPCC is an important platform for adaptation planning but it needs to evolve further in terms of climate-oriented regional analysis to capture micro-level sensitivity and constraints.
  5. Moreover, convergence of climate actions with ongoing efforts and several Central schemes with similar mandates is a must. 
  6. Greater expertise and consultations are required for a systematic prioritisation of actions and fiscal prudence for building climate resilient agriculture.