send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A draws a bill on B for INR 500 payable to the order of A. B accepts the bill, but subsequently dishonour it by non – payment. A sues B on the bill but B proves that it was accepted for value as to INR 400, and as an accommodation to the plaintiff as to the residue. Thus, as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, A can only recover the following amount:
900
500
400
100
- Option 1: 900
- Not possible. The bill was only for INR 500.
- Option 2: 500
- A cannot recover INR 500 because part of the bill (INR 100) was an accommodation for A. B is only liable for the portion accepted for value.
- Option 3: 400
- Correct. As per the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, B can only be held liable for the amount accepted for value. Therefore, A can recover INR 400.
- Option 4: 100
- Incorrect. Since this amount was for A’s accommodation, it is unrecoverable from B.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses