send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which one of the following cases were the provisions of the Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act which gave precedence to all or any Directive Principles of States Policy over the Fundamental Right invalidated by the Supreme Court?
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
Waman Rai v. Union of India
Kesavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India - The provisions of the Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act gave precedence to all or any Directive Principles of States Policy over the Fundamental Right invalidated by the Supreme Court
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses