send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The nature of a wagering agreement was explained in:
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose
Derry v. Peek
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
None of these
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose – Minors contract is voidDerry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1 is a case on English contract law, fraudulent misstatement, and the tort of deceit.Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. - Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892] EWCA Civ 1 is an English contract law decision by the Court of Appeal, which held an advertisement containing certain terms to get a reward constituted a binding unilateral offer that could be accepted by anyone who performed its terms.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses