send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In a case, plaintiff filed a suit for injury received due to a defective lift. The defendant was allowed to adduce evidence that 300 persons have used the lift and none met with any accident. What is the evidentiary value of the evidence?
The evidence may be adduced as relevant fact under Section 7 of the IEA
The evidence so led is irrelevant
The evidence so adduced is weak
The evidence so adduced can be proved under Section 9 of the IEA
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses