send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In relation to ownership of property, “possession is”
Prima Facie Proof
Conclusive Proof
Irrelevant
None of the above
- Option 1: Prima Facie Proof
- Possession implies a presumption of ownership.
- It suggests that the person in possession is likely the owner.
- This can be challenged and proven otherwise with evidence.
- Correct Answer
- Option 2: Conclusive Proof
- This suggests possession proves ownership with no room for dispute.
- Incorrect, as possession alone can be disputed in court.
- Option 3: Irrelevant
- This means possession has no importance in property ownership.
- Incorrect, as possession is a significant factor in ownership claims.
- Option 4: None of the above
- None of the provided options are accurate.
- Incorrect, because option 1 holds truth about possession.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses