Which of the following is true ........

Limitation Act (LA) 1963 Others

Which of the following is true?

The Limitation Act, 1963 with its new law signifies that it does not make any racial or class distinction since both Hindu and Muslim Law are now available under the law of limitation as per the existing statute book.

In the matter of Syndicate Bank v. Prabha D. Naik, (AIR 2001 SC 1968) the Supreme Court has observed that the law of limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963 does not make any racial or class distinction while making or indulging any law to any particular person.

Both a and b

Neither a nor b

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Others

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

Sections 86 and Section 87 of the Civil Procedure Code, requires the consent of the Central Government before suing foreign rulers, ambassadors and envoys. The Limitation Act, 1963 provides that when the time obtained for obtaining such consent shall be excluded for computing the period of limitation for filing such suits.
The Limitation Act, 1963 with its new law signifies that it does not make any racial or class distinction since both Hindu and Muslim Law are now available under the law of limitation as per the existing statute book. In the matter of Syndicate Bank v. Prabha D. Naik, (AIR 2001 SC 1968) the Supreme Court has observed that the law of limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963 does not make any racial or class distinction while making or indulging any law to any particular person.